Tragedy, Fate and Nemesis

THE LOSS OF THE SENSE OF TRAGEDY AND THE RISE OF NEW AGE THINKING

"There be many shapes of mystery And many things God makes to be, Past hope or fear.
And the end men looketh for cometh not And a path there is where no man sought.
So hath it fallen here."
– Euripedes

In our modern-day Western culture, we think we have control over our lives; we take this for granted; it is our presumed worldview. But in many or perhaps even most cultures of the world, the opposite is the norm. These 'other than Western' and more ancient cultures live in the daily recognition of greater and more powerful forces than the will and intelligence of any individual.

It is obvious to a person of these cultures that an individual does not control his destiny . . . Rather, they believe, one exists under the control of powerful constraints and must live in constant acknowledgment of that greater force or what could be called 'Fate.'

"Fate is a superior force: When we are talking about fate, we are talking about God, the Divine or the Devil." - Carl Jung

Outside of our modern age of technology, where man did and still does not have so much 'control' over the natural world and lived closer to everything and more obviously at the mercy of natural forces, it was plainly and often painfully apparent that man could not control his world, his destiny or his fate. In this more original, ‘primitive’ environment, man recognized, believed in, and sought to be in harmony with a great God or gods. He lived with a fear of the 'Devil' or nature spirits and feared them if he violated their laws.

More recently, in our so-called 'New Age,' we have become ‘Godless,’ especially in the West (and in whatever part of the world that is touched by the technology of the West). We no longer feel ourselves at the ‘mercy’ of God or a superior force or 'Law' that we must supplicate or be in accord with. We no longer stand in humble awe of the mystery of our own or another's fate. We naively believe that we control our fate and our destiny. We believe we can ‘do our own thing . . .’

Lived from behind the insulated walls of houses and cars, readily available food, endless amounts of information, and quickly changing news, discoveries, and fashions, we are no longer enmeshed in the idea of fate and what it represents. We don't know many stories about it and don't educate our children about fate. We lack an understanding of this great ancient principle and rarely consider it. As a result, we do not recognize the great Mystery in which we live and the slender thread by which we hang within it. We feast our attention on the daily news, eating the fast food of our 'popular' culture.

We confuse true heroes with celebrities. We burn mere incense with much of our medical treatments, addressing the symptoms of our diseases with drugs and surgeries instead of identifying and removing the causes that produced them. Our medical system is now the third leading cause of death in the Western world. 'The maxim of Hippocrates to physicians to 'First do no harm' has been terribly violated and forgotten. We have become so used to the stench of our sickness (and how we treat it) that we don't even notice the smell anymore.

Our failure to appreciate fate or a ‘superior force’ results in psychic blindness peculiar to our modern age and Western man in general. Being carried upon the great technological advances of our modern-day world (which fills our minds with ideas and images but little wisdom) tends to increase our insulation from Reality).

Tragedy and the tragic nature of all things, this ancient 'truth' of life, has been forgotten, and with this forgetting comes the rise of what I call - 'New Age' thinking (thinking based on the fundamental assumption that individuals can determine their own destiny and control their life). This is a basic teaching of the New Age. Many have heard about, ’The Secret': . . . It postulates the theory of attraction. Thoughts work like magnets, attracting what we want through our vibration. In this way, the Law of Attraction establishes that we have the power to achieve everything we truly set our minds to,” Everyone can create their own reality. Our thoughts can solidify into Reality.”

In countless workshops and self-help books, people are encouraged to create their own reality, manifest their desires, and visualize down to the last detail what they seek to attain. It is thought that if you can see or imagine it, if you can visualize it, you can create it, and it will become reality.

A view of life as controllable lies at the basis of such thinking. I agree this approach might be appropriate in a petri dish or laboratory or with a calibrated machine, but life is not such a machine. Of course, some aspects of life can be controlled and measured. But the vast majority of life is out of our control. One would certainly agree if they or those they know had ever been in an earthquake, tsunami, or riot, had a terrible accident, sickness, or experienced the chaos of war.

I suggest the consideration of the ancient ideas of Fate and Tragedy offers a more wholesome, inclusive, and humbling Truth. This Truth offers a glimpse of the 'Nature' of Reality, which cannot be escaped or denied.

It is critically important to observe the Nature of Reality,

so we may adapt and harmonize with it. Otherwise, we may waste our lives struggling against something we cannot change; indeed, this is the very reason that ancient civilizations sought to conform themselves to God or superior powers of life.

There is an intriguing story about Lawrence of Arabia that places the modern idea of controlling one's reality against the ancient idea of Tragedy and fate; it is supposedly a true story told in Lawrence's autobiography, The Seven Pillars of Wisdom. It is a story that contrasts what I am calling - ‘New Age, positive thinking’ with ancient cultures throughout the world.

"IT IS WRITTEN"

Lawrence of Arabia

In 1917, during WWI, Lawrence of Arabia (an Englishman) united many of the 'up-till-then' warring Arab tribes. He led them to attack the Turks at the port city of Al'Aqabah, which sits at the head of what is called, today, the Gulf of Katherina, a hundred and fifty miles south of the Dead Sea; a place where the modern-day Sinai peninsula, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Israel all meet.

Al'Aqabah was a key port for all supplies and guns coming through the Suez Canal. The city was surrounded on its back by a vast 'uncrossable' desert and on either side by impassable hills. Considered accessible only by way of the gulf, huge guns had been placed by the Turks at a fort there to guard and secure the water approach. But the guns at Aqabah could only face the water. They were not capable of being turned to face the desert, for no one had ever crossed that terrible stretch of desert hell known as the 'Devil's Anvil.' But now, Lawrence, working on behalf of the English, after much work, cajoling, and consideration with the Arab tribes, had boldly decided to take Al'Aqabah from behind, sweeping in and conquering, unanticipated, from the desert itself.

To unite the various tribes of Arabs that dwelt in that area had been a long and considerable task. Now, with his campaign to take Aqabah finally underway, Lawrence and his men began traveling at night, as the sun was too intense to travel during the day across that burning desert. After many days of such travel, one morning, as the first light of dawn broke, it was discovered that one of the men was no longer on his camel.

He had 'obviously' fallen asleep during the night and tumbled off his mount onto the ground, knocking himself unconscious. Everyone knew that a man without shelter from the sun, water, and a camel would never survive in such a situation. Lawrence insisted that someone go back immediately to rescue the man.

As a 'Christian', Western man, Lawrence saw action of this sort as necessary to maintain the sense of rightness, unity and camaraderie upon which he felt their enterprise succeeding. The Arabs, however, to a man, all refused. "No", they said. "He will most certainly die." This so-called 'fact' was the law and worldview with which they lived their lives. "You cannot change the will of Allah," they argued. "It is written!"

Lawrence, offended with what he thought their too easy acceptance of fate, emphatically insisted, "Nothing is written!" and set off himself back into the blazing furnace of that desert day to find the man and bring him back. The Arab tribesmen watched him go and hobbling their camels, set up their awnings and tents and made ready to rest and sleep through the day. That evening, after the blazing heat of the day began to abate, they made ready to travel again.

As they did so, on the horizon, they saw Lawrence, on his camel, riding back with the man who had been lost. The Arabs burst out in ecstatic celebration and ran towards him, firing their rifles into the sky and gesticulating wildly. "AUR-RANCE, AUR-RANCE, AUR-RANCE!" they shouted. Lawrence, exhausted and totally spent, was supremely happy. He had proven to these men that they could create their own destiny. He had shown that, 'Nothing was written.'

Now, he became an even greater leader among them; he had demonstrated another way to accept the heavy mantle of God and Fate. The Arabs came to believe that perhaps for Lawrence, nothing was written. He was free of the usual constraints that fell upon the rest of them. He was a unique and mighty man. They would follow him anywhere. He would write his own chapter in the Book of Life, and they would be there with him to witness and share it.

“Good resolutions are checks that men draw on a bank where they have no account”
– Oscar Wilde

Several days passed, and Lawrence and his Arab warriors neared Aqabah. To escape detection, they began to travel during the day and rest at night, sending out scouts ahead of them. As they approached nearer to Aqabah, tension began to run high amongst the tribesmen. One night, when they had paused to rest and sleep had settled over the camp, several shots rang out; then shouts and a raucous turmoil split the night. Lawrence awoke and ran immediately to see what the problem was. The two main (and previously antagonistic) tribes, which he had worked so hard to unite, were now up in arms, bearing torches and guns and shouting threats at each other.

It seems a man from one tribe had attempted to steal something from a man in the other tribe. When the thief had been discovered, he ran and the man he was stealing from shot and killed him. The thief/murderer had run back to his own encampment. But, he had been seen and identified. The tribesmen of the man who had been murdered angrily demanded the right to kill the thief immediately. The other tribe, while not condoning the crime, absolutely refused to let members of the 'other' tribe kill one of their own. They would punish him themselves. It was a volatile standoff. The old enmities arose, and the unity of the assemblage and the taking of Aqabah hung in the balance. The situation called for immediate action, or a battle among the tribes would surely ensue.

Then, in the midst of the argument, Lawrence walked out between the two tribes and shouted, "Give me a gun. I will kill him myself. Then both tribes will preserve honor." The tribesmen on both sides fell silent as they accepted this solution. Lawrence was given a gun, and the murderer was brought before him, arms bound behind him, and then forced to his knees; both tribes gathered to witness the shot that would fulfill the law. As Lawrence raised the gun to the man's head, the man looked up at Lawrence, and Lawrence saw that the man he was to kill was the very man he had rescued only a few days before from the desert. Lawrence pulled the trigger, and the man fell dead. The next day, they rode into Aqabah and took the city.

This true story narrates a great mystery beyond the walls of our everyday considerations. What is fate? What is written? For whom is it written? Can it be changed? Are we in control of our lives? Can we ever be?

"Two bums are sitting on a curb downtown, and one says to the other, "Do you believe in fate?" "Hell yes!" says the other bum. I sure wouldn't have chosen to be here on my own."

This is a humorous way of considering a great paradox in our lives. Are we impelled by 'fate'’ or is it our own actions, weaknesses, or strengths that bring about our destiny? Is there such a thing as Tragedy or unmerited misfortune? Do we 'deserve' exactly what we get?

TRAGEDY

TRAGEDY: 1. a serious play having an unhappy or disastrous ending brought about by the characters or central character, impelled in ancient drama, by fate, or, more recently, by moral weakness, psychological maladjustment, or social pressures.

As evident in the modern dictionary definition (above), there have been major changes in the definition of Tragedy. It is important to note that whereas in the ancient world, Tragedy was brought about by 'fate,' in our modern world, it is considered due to some individual 'moral weakness' or lapse.

This latter idea (Tragedy as the result of moral lapse) corresponds with the modern idea that every man is directly responsible for his fate through his will and/or moral action. The thinking is that if a man acts well and righteously, then everything will turn out well for him. In our modern Western culture, as I have already proposed, we have little sympathy for the ancient idea of 'fate' as the cause of tragedy. We tend to hold a person or persons responsible; we blame someone. This 'difference' between the ancient and modern cultures represents profoundly different views of the world, views which we will now further consider.

Isak Dinesen wrote that the difference between various people of her time could be seen in their views on Tragedy.

"The true aristocracy and the true proletariat of the world are both in understanding with Tragedy. To them, it is the fundamental principle of God and the key, the minor key to existence. They differ in this way from the bourgeoisie of all classes who deny tragedy, who will not tolerate it, and to whom the word tragedy means, in itself, unpleasantness."

Isak Dinesen was the pen name of Karen von Blixen, who wrote about her life in the book: 'Out of Africa.'

Karen von Blixen

In ancient Greece, Tragedy was considered such an important idea that it formed a complete and separate category of drama. Ancient Tragedies involved noble characters with good intentions who were trying to accomplish great and righteous purposes. However, they not only failed in what they sought to accomplish but brought suffering, misery, and even death to those who helped them and those they tried to help.

To the ancient Greeks, Tragedy was a demonstration of unmerited misfortune brought about by fate, not just by a 'moral weakness' in which one 'knowingly' does something wrong. One of the most famous examples of Tragedy is the story of Oedipus. Although this story is today primarily known for the famous 'Oedipal complex' first put forward by Sigmund Freud, it is also a profound consideration of fate and free will.

OEDIPUS

Oedipus unknowingly killed his father, married his mother, and then blinded himself when it was revealed to him what he had done. Here is a summary of his story:

King Laius of Thebes and his wife, Jocasta, had received a prophecy that their newborn son was fated to kill his Father and marry his Mother. Heartbroken, they sought to avoid such a fate for the sake of themselves, their country, and their baby. So, they pierced their baby's feet with a nail (Oedipus means 'swollen foot'), tied them together, and instructed their shepherd to abandon him on a mountain to die. Instead, the shepherd took pity on the baby and carried him to the neighboring kingdom of Corinth, where he was adopted by King Polybus and his Queen Merope. As Oedipus grew up, he heard rumors that King Polybus and his queen were not his real birth parents, so Oedipus journeyed to the Oracle at Delphi to find out the truth about his situation. The Oracle again prophesied that he would kill his father and marry his mother.

Horrified by this and determined to prevent it, Oedipus did not return to his (unknown to him) only 'adoptive' parents (not the ones he was prophesied to kill). Then, he began to wander through the land, determined never to see his home again where the terrible fate of killing his father might ever occur. Traveling on the way to Thebes (the home of his real parents), he met his (unknown to him) Father. They fell into an argument about who had right away on the narrow mountain road, and when Laius (his father) tried to strike Oedipus with his scepter, Oedipus threw his father down from the chariot and killed him.

After this, while traveling through the countryside to Thebes, Oedipus encountered the Sphinx, a beast with the head and breast of a woman, a lioness's body, and an eagle's wings. The Sphinx had been terrorizing the people of Thebes by killing anyone who could not answer his questions. Oedipus successfully answered the questions of the Sphinx, and the Sphinx threw itself from the mountain ledge where it had been living to its death. In this way, Oedipus freed the city of Thebes from its curse. Because of this act and because King Laius had been killed (the killer was unknown), Oedipus was chosen to be the King, and he married his (real-life) Mother, Jocasta, fulfilling the fate predicted for him at birth and the Delphic Oracle.

So, despite his real parents hearing his fate from an Oracle and attempting to avoid it, and despite his hearing his own fate and trying to avoid it, it all came to pass. Was it written?

The story of Oedipus extends far out beyond this brief summary, and touches on many of the paradoxes and subtleties of Fate and Nemesis. If you wish to see a movie of the original play, go here:

Is our life in our hands?

These are stories of fate—free will and what we can and cannot do. The Greeks pondered these questions at the dawn of Western civilization. As you might imagine, it is clear the Greeks believed in Fate. They marveled at a world in which even when people had great abilities, intelligence, hope, and ideals and sought to attain something noble, they often were not able to do so, and because of this, the Greeks considered the idea and reality of tragedy to be worthy of contemplation.

When I look around, it is obvious that I am not in charge of my life. Not in some "I can't get to the store if I want to," but rather in the 'sense' that I may not always get there through my own efforts. Perhaps a good metaphor for this is the ancient sailor - He can build a good boat, have an experienced crew, put up his sails, and set out for Ithaca, but like Odysseus, he cannot control the winds. He is totally at the mercy of the weather; he is at the mercy of the sea, storms, typhoons, currents, and becalming; he is at the mercy of gods and goddesses. The very first lines of Homer's Odyssey lays out the power of fate on the hero - Ulysses:

​Speak, Memory —
Of the cunning hero,
The wanderer, blown off course time and again
After he plundered Troy's sacred heights.

Imagine that you are out on the ocean, perhaps rounding the Cape of Good Hope and the southern tip of Africa where the waters of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans meet. Some of the most dangerous weather and waves are found there. As so many have before you, you would distinctly feel and notice that you are not completely in charge of your journey; this was the felt and observed worldview of the Greeks and ancients worldwide. People and cultures acknowledged this when they offered 'sacrifices' to the Gods and the forces of nature. This is the worldview we have lost because of our 'seeming' separation from nature through technology, a separation that is impossible, or as possible as separating wetness from water. But, we have fallen into blindness and insensitivity, and we have become 'Godless.'

Without our sense of Tragedy, we believe that we control our fate and can dominate the world. We believe we can create the ideal government, political system, or relationship. We think we know the ‘Secret,’ that if we can think it, if we can see it in our mind's eye it will happen. We believe we can make it happen, whatever 'it' is. This way of thinking has become more prevalent than ever in the West, so I have titled my reflections in this essay "The Loss of the Sense of Tragedy and the Rise of New Age Thinking".

NEMESIS

The Goddess Nemesis: Her foot stands on the image of a man and she holds a wheel (symbol of everchanging motion that always remains the same)

Now, let us consider another particular aspect of God or fate, that force which is greater than ourselves. Let us consider what has someitmes been called the ‘Devil’ in modern times, which the ancient Greeks called the Goddess ‘Nemesis’.

"Revenge (Nemesis) pursues a person." - Linnaeus

Nemesis

From the ancient Greeks, from whom we have both the word and concept; Nemesis was the Goddess of retributive justice and Divine vengeance. Nemesis, in today's usage, usually refers to the one who seeks to impose retribution.

Darius of Persia on his throne

When the Persian armies of Darius invaded Greece, they hauled with them, with tremendous effort, a huge piece of exquisite white Parian marble with which, they expected, to erect a trophy, memorializing their victory over the Greeks. Defeated on the plains of Marathon by a smaller Greek force, they failed in their quest. The huge stone was bandoned in their retreat, and the Greeks ordered their Persian captives to haul the block of marble thirty miles inland, where it was carved into a statue of the Goddess Nemesis by Agorakritos, a pupil of the famous sculptor Phidias. It stood in Greece in the city of Rhamnus, the principal sanctuary of Nemesis.

Nemesis is the goddess that prescribed both happiness and misery to mortals. She was a zealous punisher of "hubris," the disrespectful arrogance of humans who thought their destiny was under their own control. (The worship of Nemesis ended in 382 CE when the Byzantine emperor Arcadius ordered that all pagan temples be destroyed).

The Greeks made that statue to honor the Goddess Nemesis. She represented that force of life that was out of their hands, both theirs and those of the Persians. She represented the inescapable destiny that determined the life of every mortal being. To build a statue of Nemesis was to recognize and honor with awe and reverence the Gods, and in this case, the idea of tragedy and fate.

Nemesis was one of two younger sisters of the Fates. These two sisters helped the Fates carry out their work. The first of these younger sisters was Tyche, or luck, representing chance or capriciousness. Tyche distributed good or bad fortune and the accompanying signs of wealth and progeny, irrespective of the industry or virtue of the individual. Notice how she stands with her foot on the shoulder of the man below. It symbolizes being under the foot of or in submission to that aspect of fate called - 'luck'.

The Goddess Tyche

With Tyche, it did not matter who you were or how you acted, she might bless you with good or bad fortune. If you ever go to Reno or Las Vegas you will witness a whole city dedicated to Tyche.

Tyche was also called - Automatia, from whom we have the word, 'automatic'. This referred to her quality of causing things to happen according to her own will, without regard to man's merit.

Tyche's lack of justice was countered and balanced by her sister Nemesis. For, whereas Tyche awarded her blessings indiscriminately, Nemesis was moved by a sense of Divine Justice. Nemesis brought low those who soared too high and humbled those who thought themselves mighty and not cognizant of fate or destiny.

One way a person could transgress against the Gods in ancient Greece was by having an excess of good fortune. Even though a person may be blessed by all the fruits of Tyche or Luck, Nemesis would inevitably demonstrate the divine retributive and balancing force that would bring down the offending individual.

The Greeks tell the story of the King of Samos, Polycrates, who was warned of the incredible good luck that pursued him.

Polycrates

Polycrates was always mindful of the necessity of preventing any retribution from Nemesis, and he offered greater and greater sacrifices of his good fortune to her, trying to placate this 'irresistible and inevitable' force of fate. However, his luck only became more and more phenomenal.

Polycrates good friend, the Pharaoh of Egypt, Amasis II, came to visit the King. Amasis wrote Polycrates a letter:

“I do not like your great fortunes because I know they cause the envy of the Gods. That is why I want, and especially for those that I love, in some things to have good luck, but sometimes to face bad luck as well, so that life passes with alternations, not constantly to be only happy. Because I have not heard or know of anyone who always lives in happiness, whose life does not end in pain and misery.

So trust me and do as I tell you. Look to find out what is most precious to you, something that if you lose it, your soul will hurt, and throw it away, never to be seen by the human eye again. And, if it does happen, so that your happiness and your sorrow do not begin to alternate again, continue every now and then with the same tactic.

So, Polycrates went out on a ship into the Mediterraneum and threw his most treasured and priceless ring into the sea as an offering to Nemesis. This ring had belonged to his father and had been handed down for generations in his family as a symbol of power and wealth, Then, Polycrates retired to his palace and, a week later, prepared a great feast to honor the gods.

A great many fish were caught for the celebration and when the cook cut one open, there in the belly of the fish was the ring that Polycrates had thrown into the sea. The ring was returned to Polycrates. Struck with this ominous sign of the refusal of his sacrifice by the Goddess Nemesis, the Egyptian Pharoah quickly left the kingdom. Polycrates became sick and, soon after, he was assassinated.

To the ancient Greeks, the ideas of Nemesis and her sister Tyche are inextricably woven together with fate and tragedy, and I believe they still are. But they are like unwanted children to much of our current thinking, going against our culture and opposing our 'parents' who tell us we control our own fate and can manifest our desires. It is not impossible to direct our destiny, of course we can try and do that. But, again, we cannot ultimately and finally control our lives or fate, and if we live long enough, we will see many instances of unsought-for results and events. The realization of the Tragic nature of life is a fact that is rarely noticed and a pearl of wisdom gained usually by those who have suffered, or aged, not by the idealistic young.

Consider how many factors go into everyday circumstances; although things are predictable to an extent, they are not so completely, and this is what Tyche or luck represents. One need not go to Las Vegas or Reno to realize this truth. Life itself represents a gamble, even to the best prepared and in the soberest of enterprises.

Would anyone accuse General Eisenhower, the Supreme Commander of the Allied forces during WWII, of being a negative or sloppy thinker? When 'Fortress' Europe was held by the Nazis, it took years of meticulous planning to invade Europe by the sea, and the failure of that mission would have dramatically extended the cost of the war in materials and lives.

However, Eisenhower was more than a great general and planner; he recognized there was a higher power that would ultimately decide whether the invasion would succeed or fail. In recognition of that 'higher power,' Eisenhower wrote out an admission of failure on a scrap of paper on the eve of the Normandy invasion. He kept it in his wallet to be issued as a press release if the D-Day invasion of the European mainland in World War II failed.

It read:

"Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold, and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air and navy did all their bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt, it is mine alone."

-Ike Eisenhower, June 5, 1944. Written on the eve of the Normandy invasion (Misdated by Eisenhower "July 5") The letter is on display in the National Archives in Washington D.C.

Eisenhower with troops 24hrs before D-Day

Eisenhower, in spite of tremendously thorough planning, was aware of the huge and potentially 'terrible' amount of factors outside of his control. Unlike the Persians, he was humbled by it all. His letter was an example of not just being prepared for all circumstances; it was a recognition of the impossibility of knowing everything. Eisenhower's letter was a recognition of Fate and Nemesis. He recognized superior forces to the ones he had assembled, not only the Germans but a great and far more powerful unknown. He did not haul a block of marble for his victory like Darius so that he could be immortalized. Instead, he planned for defeat. Eisenhower took responsibility for his actions and realized that the results of his actions were beyond his control. He recognized both God and the Devil and was humbled by that recognition.

Eisenhower had spent months reviewing plans and scenarios for the landing on the European continent. He visualized every detail of the Normandy invasion as if the fate of civilization was at stake, and it was. But he was also conscious of and planned for defeat and failure. In this, he represented a man still in touch with the ancient idea of tragedy.

​Another Way to Look at Tragedy . . .

“God created the Law of Karma and then retired.” - Mahatma Gandhi

In Hindu and Buddhist philosophy, there is no such thing as tragedy. Everything happens according to the Law of Karma. Gandhi suggests that God 'retired', once the Law of Karma had been created; for nothing else was needed. In Hinduism and Buddhism, according to whether one does good or evil, one will inevitably, eventually and always receive the fruits of his actions. It is the Law. It may not happen when you want it to, but in this life or one to follow, it will happen; amd, no thing lasts forever.

​According to the Indian philosophy of karma, the fruits of action are gathered and then expressed over many lifetimes. It is difficult to judge a person or their actions or predict their future based on what we can observe in only one life. The great sages of the East have said that the ability to judge another rightly is extremely subtle. There is a story about this:

A Thorn. a Gold Coin and the Law of Karma

A Sadhu (religius renunciate) was walking along a path in the forest. As he went along, he stepped on a thorn. It painfully entered his foot. He immediately went and sat under a tree to pull out the thorn from his foot.

As he was sitting there, an evil man came walking along the same path. This man was known as a terrible person, constantly engaged in stealing and lying.

When he came to the very spot where the Sadhu had gotten the thorn in his foot, the evil man looked down and found a gold coin. Happily he picked it up, put it in his pocket and continued on his way. The Sadhu was confused by these events and considered them in his mind as he continued to his Guru's (teacher's) ashram.

When he arrived, he bowed to his Guru and put forth the following question:

“Guruji, I was walking down the forest path on my way here. I stepped on a thorn and went beneath a tree to pull it out. As I sat there I saw a well known thief and cheat come down the same path. When he came to the exact point where I had stepped on a thorn, he looked down and found a gold coin. How could this be? Why is it that I got a thorn in my foot and he got a gold coin? I have been doing religious practice and living an upright life. He certainly has not. How could the fruits of our karma be so dramatically different?”

The Guru quietly listened to the story of his disciple and then, without saying a word, passed into deep meditation. They sat together for an hour and when the Guru came out of meditation he said,

“Swami, because of your past karma in another life, you were supposed to be killed today. But, because of your good and righteous actions in this life, you have escaped with the prick of a thorn.

The thief, according to his past actions was to become crowned a wealthy king today. Because of his evil actions in this life, he has gotten only a single gold coin. The law of karma does not make mistakes.”

The great Tibetan Lama, Dilgo Khyentse Rimpoche said:

If you want to know your past, look at your present.

If you want to know your future, look at your actions.

So, how do we understand fate? How do we understand the Law of Karma? I don’t know for sure, but I hope to have deepened the questions you might ask in this consideration.

Personally, I notice that I do not control my life, nor, I believe, does anyone else completely control theirs. I notice that despite everything we do to make something happen, it may not happen, and everything we do to prevent something from happening may happen. This humbles me in the face of my lack of ability. It sensitizes me to greater force, power, and intelligence than myself. It lays me out like a sacrifice to what many call 'God.' As far as 'God', I do not know who or what that is or means, but, I sense something, some Him or Her, Intelligence, Power, Nature or Fate.

Tragedy is far from being merely an error or lack of a person or group who tries and fails to accomplish something grand; perhaps it is our sense of what we must call 'God.'

Perhaps, ‘It is written” and life is tragic, or fated after all. Or, Perhaps not?

​I believe there is both Fate (Destiny) and 'Free will.' I believe in the paradoxical statement that fate can be somewhat modified. I believe that what is fated to be a rock falling on your head can change, through right action, into a leaf falling off a tree that only brushes past your face.

God Willing, I hope to clarify that one day,

I doubt I ever will.